October 30, 2007
NFL Football Visits the Brits: Will the League Make It Global?
On Sunday, October 28, 2007, the first ever NFL regular season match to take place outside of North America occurred in London , England . The New York Giants and the Miami Dolphins made the trip across the pond to square off in London ’s Wembley Stadium (pictured right with the Dolphins' mascot). 81,176 people packed into the stadium to see the team’s play. There is no question that the league played this game in Europe and has plans of playing another game internationally next season because they are hoping to capitalize on the international market. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was quoted saying, “The international popularity of the NFL grows every year.” He noted that many of the leagues supporters in England have been watching since the NFL was broadcast on terrestrial television in the 1980s. However, it unclear whether the league would be able to generate ticket and gate sales from multiple games in Europe for a profit, or if the best they could do internationally is benefit from TV revenues. Just because the market seems to be growing, and there was a large turnout for the game this weekend, does not necessarily mean that the NFL and American football will be able to have staying power in Europe .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Blimey Mate, sure hard on us - we like football, just not your Yankee type. GMC
I enjoyed reading your post. I thought the topic was well-chosen and pertinent, and that you addressed it with level of diligence sufficient enough to inform even the least informed football fan about the NFL’s developments overseas. In addition, I really like your choice of links; of the ones I visited, I thought all but one of them were pertinent to your argument and helpful for the reader in understanding all the ins and outs of the situation. On the whole, I thoroughly enjoyed your post and thought that it was exceedingly well done. However, there were a couple small details which I feel, if adjusted, could make your post even more effective: the one link which I felt failed to enhance your argument, and the lack of links on your images.
The one link which I didn’t find particularly helpful was the one following your comment on New York coach Tom Coughlin’s willingness to discuss the London game’s impact on his players with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, which you mark “opinions”. The link takes the reader to a general article about the game, as opposed to an article or statement elaborating on or reflecting Coughlin’s opinion. As a reader, I was disappointed by that, and felt more inclined to close the link rather than read the article in search of Coughlin’s opinion. I understand, however, that there may have been no particular article providing only this information, and therefore, this article does serve as an acceptable, although not ideal, substitute.
The one other small detail which, as a reader, disappointed me was the lack of links on the images you chose. I thought the images were well chosen and pertinent in and of themselves, but when I clicked on them, hoping to explore the page from which they came, I was disappointed to only see larger versions of the images themselves.
Even with these two minor detractors, I thought this was an outstanding post. As a reader, I thoroughly enjoyed both the topic selection itself and the way in which you addressed that topic. I thought your argument was well stated and well executed. Great job.
Post a Comment